Search


Compare phones

Global Score
33.536.8
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
--Series 40 UI
--2013-02-25
3.60 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches4.49 x 1.97 x 0.49 inches
3.00 ounces3.60 ounces
--Black, Blue, Red, White and Yellow
$ 200.00$ 145.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
128 x 160 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTLCD
114 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.36
processor processor
8 MB RAM64 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.675.76
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
01.32
Camera
0.30 MP3.20 MP
--f/2.80 aperture
--320 x 240 (30 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
3.636.27
CDMAHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
--SIM, Dual SIM
0.11.2
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery1200mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
3.7 hours talk time504 hours standby time
20 hours talk time
2.562.88
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 2.1, EDR
GPS--

Comparison review

Nokia 301 is slightly better than Samsung SPH-M300, getting a 36.8 score against 33.5. The Nokia 301 body is way thinner but heavier than the Samsung SPH-M300. The Nokia 301 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung SPH-M300, and although they both have 0 cpu cores, the Nokia 301 also has 56 MB more RAM memory.

Nokia 301 has a brighter display than Samsung SPH-M300, because it has a way better resolution of 320 x 240 pixels and a better count of pixels per inch in the display. The Nokia 301 has a way better camera than Samsung SPH-M300, because it has a lot more mega pixels back camera. Nokia 301 features a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung SPH-M300, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 32 GB.

The Nokia 301 features greater battery lifetime than Samsung SPH-M300, because it has 1200mAh of battery capacity.

In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Nokia 301 is also by far the cheapest one.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.