Search


Compare phones

Global Score
33.536.4
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
--2009-01-29
3.60 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches4.32 x 1.77 x 0.43 inches
3.00 ounces4.11 ounces
$ 200.00$ 155.00
Display / Screen
--2.2 inches
128 x 160 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
114 pixels per inch182 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.36.4
processor processor
8 MB RAM--
GPU GPU
5.675.76
Storage
--174,08 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
00.7
Camera
0.30 MP5.00 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
3.635.94
CDMAHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.11.1
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery960mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
3.7 hours talk time300 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.562.48
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 2.1, EDR
GPSGPS
--Accelerometer

Comparison review

Nokia 6700 classic is a little bit better than the Samsung SPH-M300, having a 36.4 score against 33.5. Nokia 6700 classic is a extremely thinner but heavier phone than Samsung SPH-M300. The Nokia 6700 classic has a little bit better performance than Samsung SPH-M300. Both of them have the same number of cores.

Nokia 6700 classic features a much better looking screen than Samsung SPH-M300, because it has a much higher 320 x 240px resolution and way more pixels per inch of screen. The Nokia 6700 classic has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung SPH-M300. Nokia 6700 classic has a much better camera than Samsung SPH-M300, because it has a much higher 5 mega pixels resolution camera.

The Samsung SPH-M300 features a little longer battery lifetime than Nokia 6700 classic, because it has a 1000mAh battery size.

The Nokia 6700 classic not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a great choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.