Compare phones
Samsung Reclaim
SPH-M560| Global Score | |
| 33.5 | 36.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | 2009-08-06 |
| 3.60 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches | 3.90 x 2.37 x 0.59 inches |
| 3.00 ounces | 3.50 ounces |
| $ 200.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.6 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 114 pixels per inch | 154 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.3 | 5.9 |
| processor | processor |
| 8 MB RAM | -- |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.67 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 3.63 | 4.73 |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 3.7 hours talk time | 6 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
Samsung Reclaim has a general score of 36.8, which is slightly better than Samsung SPH-M300's global score of 33.5. Samsung Reclaim is a somewhat heavier but thinner phone than the Samsung SPH-M300. The Samsung Reclaim features a sharper display than Samsung SPH-M300, because it has a way higher resolution of 240 x 320px and a better screen density.
The Samsung Reclaim's storage capacity to store more apps and games is very similar to the Samsung SPH-M300 one. The Samsung Reclaim has a little better performance than Samsung SPH-M300. They have the same number of cores. Samsung Reclaim's battery performance is just as good as the battery life in Samsung SPH-M300.
Samsung Reclaim takes way better videos and photos than Samsung SPH-M300, because it has a camera in the back with way more MP.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Reclaim is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.