Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.4 | 33.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Blackberry |
| -- | BlackBerry |
| 2008-09-02 | 2007-10-01 |
| 3.60 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches | 4.20 x 1.95 x 0.55 inches |
| 2.70 ounces | 3.40 ounces |
| $ 150.00 | $ 107.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 240 x 260 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 136 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.7 |
| processor | Intel XScale (Single-Core 312 MHz) processor |
| -- | 32 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 6.12 |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 3.63 | 4.73 |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.4 hours talk time | 216 hours standby time 3.7 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
BlackBerry Pearl 8130 has a score of 33.9, which is a bit better than Samsung SPH-M320's general score of 31.4. The BlackBerry Pearl 8130 is an older and heavier cellphone than Samsung SPH-M320, but Blackberry was able to make it thinner anyway. The BlackBerry Pearl 8130 features a much better looking display than Samsung SPH-M320, because it has a way better resolution of 260 x 240px.
The BlackBerry Pearl 8130 features as much memory for games and applications as Samsung SPH-M320. The BlackBerry Pearl 8130 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung SPH-M320, because it has more cores. Samsung SPH-M320 has just a bit better battery life than BlackBerry Pearl 8130, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity.
The BlackBerry Pearl 8130 has a much better camera than Samsung SPH-M320, because it has a much higher 2 MP resolution back facing camera.
The BlackBerry Pearl 8130 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.