Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.4 | 34.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2008-09-02 | 2010-07-30 |
| 3.60 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches | 3.70 x 2.40 x 0.51 inches |
| 2.70 ounces | 3.70 ounces |
| $ 150.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.2 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 220 x 176 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 128 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.5 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 8 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.76 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 1.30 MP |
| 3.63 | 4.51 |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 950mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.4 hours talk time | 430 hours standby time 5.3 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
Motorola GRASP has a general score of 34.5, which is slightly better than Samsung SPH-M320's global score of 31.4. Even though the Motorola GRASP is extremely heavier than Samsung SPH-M320, it's extremely thinner and also newer. Motorola GRASP's processing unit is just as good as the Samsung SPH-M320 one, both of them have a 0-Core CPU.
Motorola GRASP has a way better display than Samsung SPH-M320, because it has a higher 176 x 220 resolution. The Motorola GRASP has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung SPH-M320, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 8 GB. Samsung SPH-M320 has a bit superior battery life than Motorola GRASP, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola GRASP features a very superior camera than Samsung SPH-M320, because it has a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Motorola GRASP is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.