Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.4 | 34.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2008-09-02 | 2006-07-25 |
| 3.60 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches | 4.15 x 1.79 x 0.62 inches |
| 2.70 ounces | 4.05 ounces |
| $ 150.00 | $ 120.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 176 x 220 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 128 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 20,48 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.3 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 3.63 | 4.73 |
| CDMA | EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 780mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.4 hours talk time | 350 hours standby time 6.7 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 1.2 |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola ROKR Z3 has a score of 34.5, which is slightly better than the Samsung SPH-M320's 31.4 overall score. Motorola ROKR Z3 is a noticeably older and noticeably heavier cellphone than the Samsung SPH-M320, but Motorola was able to make it somewhat thinner anyway. Motorola ROKR Z3 counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung SPH-M320, because it has a higher resolution of 220 x 176.
Motorola ROKR Z3 features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung SPH-M320. Motorola ROKR Z3's processing unit is very similar to the processing unit in Samsung SPH-M320, both of them have a 0-Core processing unit. The Motorola ROKR Z3 takes way better photographs and videos than Samsung SPH-M320, because it has a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Samsung SPH-M320 has superior battery performance than Motorola ROKR Z3, because it has a 28 percent more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Motorola ROKR Z3 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.