Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.434.2
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
2008-09-022008-04-22
3.60 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches4.25 x 1.71 x 0.41 inches
2.70 ounces2.75 ounces
$ 150.00$ 79.00
Display / Screen
--2 inches
128 x 160 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
--200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
36.3
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--30,72 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD external memory slot
00.4
Camera
0.30 MP2.00 MP
--220 x 176 video resolution
3.634.73
CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.3
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery1020mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
4.4 hours talk time406 hours standby time
5.3 hours talk time
2.562.64
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
GPS--

Comparison review

The Nokia 5220 XpressMusic is a little bit better than the Samsung SPH-M320, having a score of 34.2 against 31.4. Nokia 5220 XpressMusic's design is thinner but a little bit heavier than Samsung SPH-M320, and they were only released 4 months apart. The Samsung SPH-M320 and the Nokia 5220 XpressMusic have really similar processors, they have the same number of cores.

The Nokia 5220 XpressMusic has a way better display than Samsung SPH-M320, because it has a lot higher 320 x 240 resolution. The Nokia 5220 XpressMusic has a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung SPH-M320. Nokia 5220 XpressMusic features just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung SPH-M320, because it has a 1020mAh battery capacity.

Nokia 5220 XpressMusic features a greater camera than Samsung SPH-M320, because it has a back camera with much more mega pixels.

In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Nokia 5220 XpressMusic is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.