Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 31.4 | 34 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.1 |
| 2008-09-02 | 2006-09-26 |
| 3.60 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches | 3.74 x 2.04 x 0.79 inches |
| 2.70 ounces | 4.35 ounces |
| $ 150.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.4 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 167 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 6.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 61,44 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.5 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.80 aperture |
| 3.63 | 5.5 |
| CDMA | UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.4 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 4.2 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia N75 is just a bit better than the Samsung SPH-M320, with a global score of 34 against 31.4. The Nokia N75 is an older, somewhat thicker and notably heavier phone than the Samsung SPH-M320. The Nokia N75 and Samsung SPH-M320 count with quite similar CPUs, both of them have 0 cpu cores. Nokia N75 has a much more vibrant display than Samsung SPH-M320, because it has a much better resolution of 320 x 240 pixels.
The Nokia N75 counts with a way better camera than Samsung SPH-M320, because it has a camera with lot more mega-pixels. The Nokia N75 features a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung SPH-M320. Samsung SPH-M320 features better battery life than Nokia N75, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity.
The Nokia N75 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.