Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 31.4 | 34.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2008-09-02 | 2009-02-16 |
| 3.60 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches | 3.70 x 1.83 x 0.73 inches |
| 2.70 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 150.00 | $ 75.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 3 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 9,22 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.2 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 3.63 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.4 hours talk time | 192 hours standby time 7 hours talk time |
| 2.56 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | -- |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung E2210 is a bit better than the Samsung SPH-M320, getting a general score of 34.1 against 31.4. Samsung E2210's body is a little thicker and somewhat heavier than Samsung SPH-M320. The Samsung E2210's processing unit is just as good as Samsung SPH-M320's CPU, both have 0 cores. Samsung E2210 has a way better looking screen than Samsung SPH-M320. Both have the same exact resolution of 160 x 128.
Samsung E2210 counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung SPH-M320. The Samsung E2210 and Samsung SPH-M320 both count with very similar cameras, both have a camera with a 0.3 megapixels. Samsung SPH-M320 counts with superior battery performance than Samsung E2210, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung E2210 is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.