Search


Compare phones

Global Score
34.437.5
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
2009-09-142013-10-22
3.70 x 1.78 x 0.59 inches4.04 x 2.38 x 0.45 inches
3.17 ounces3.57 ounces
--Black, Blue, Green, Red, White and Yellow
$ 150.00$ 95.00
Display / Screen
2 inches2.8 inches
128 x 160 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTLCD
102 pixels per inch143 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive
5.25.8
processor processor
--64 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.76
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
01.32
Camera
0.30 MP2.00 MP
--f/2.80 aperture
--35.00mm focal length
--0.2 inches (1/5") sensor
--320 x 240 (13 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
3.635.72
Networks
--Wi-Fi
CDMAEDGE, GPRS and GSM
--Micro SIM, Dual SIM
0.12.8
Battery Life
960mAh Li-Ion Battery1200mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
6.3 hours talk time528 hours standby time
14 hours talk time
2.482.88
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 3.0
GPS--
--Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Nokia Asha 500 has a global score of 37.5, which is a little bit better than Samsung SPH-M330's global score of 34.4. The Nokia Asha 500 body is extremely newer and noticeably thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Samsung SPH-M330. Nokia Asha 500 counts with a better display than Samsung SPH-M330, because it has a greater pixels quantity per display inch, a really larger display and a lot better resolution of 320 x 240.

Nokia Asha 500 counts with a processing unit that's very similar to Samsung SPH-M330's processor, both have a 0-Core processor. The Nokia Asha 500 features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung SPH-M330, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 32 GB.

The Nokia Asha 500 counts with a much better camera than Samsung SPH-M330, because it has a camera with a way better 2 megapixels resolution. Nokia Asha 500 counts with longer battery life than Samsung SPH-M330, because it has 1200mAh of battery capacity instead of 960mAh.

Nokia Asha 500 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.