Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 40.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2012-01-19 | 2019-03-08 |
| 4.02 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.35 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| -- | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 133 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Yes | No touch screen |
| 5.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| -- | 6 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 20,48 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 220 x 176 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.83 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 625 hours standby time 14.7 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.56 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e is a lot better than Samsung Star 3, getting an 86.3 score against 40.7. The Galaxy S10e design is noticeably newer and much thinner, but incredibly heavier than Samsung Star 3. The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a way better looking display than Samsung Star 3, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2280 resolution, a way better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a lot bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a way bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Star 3, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a way better processing power than Samsung Star 3, because it has a higher number of faster cores.
Samsung Galaxy S10e takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Star 3, because it has a lot bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photography, a camera with a much better resolution and a much better 3840x2160 video definition. Galaxy S10e has a superior battery life than Samsung Star 3, because it has a 3100mAh battery capacity against 1000mAh.
Galaxy S10e is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.