Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3G OnlySM-N9000
| Global Score | |
| 37 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 3.87 x 1.93 x 0.66 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.15 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 182 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz + Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| -- | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.73 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 0.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 335 hours standby time 5.1 hours talk time | 490 hours standby time 20 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 is much better than the Samsung T259, getting a score of 80.7 against 37. Galaxy Note 3 is a thinner but incredibly heavier cellphone than Samsung T259. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with an incredibly better screen than Samsung T259, because it has a much better resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a way larger screen and a lot better screen pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 features a much greater processing power than Samsung T259, because it has a larger number of faster cores and an extra GPU. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung T259, because it has a lot higher 13 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a superior storage for apps and games than Samsung T259. Galaxy Note 3 has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung T259, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity against 800mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.