Search


Compare phones

Global Score
3740.4
Basic Information
SamsungSamsung
--2011-01-18
3.87 x 1.93 x 0.66 inches4.23 x 2.13 x 0.49 inches
3.15 ounces3.32 ounces
Blue--
$ 250.00$ 79.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches3 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 400 pixels
--TFT
182 pixels per inch155 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive
6.15.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
01
Camera
2.00 MP3.20 MP
--320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
4.735.39
Networks
--Wi-Fi
UMTS, EDGE and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.42.7
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
335 hours standby time
5.1 hours talk time
900 hours standby time
8.3 hours talk time
2.242.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 3.0
GPS--
--Accelerometer

Comparison review

The Samsung Star II is a bit better than the Samsung T259, with a global score of 40.4 against 37. Samsung Star II's construction is much thinner but just a little bit heavier than Samsung T259. Samsung Star II and Samsung T259 both feature extremely similar processing units, both of them have 0 CPU cores.

Samsung T259 has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Star II, because although it has a lot smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 320 x 240 pixels, it also counts with a bit greater display density. Samsung Star II features a better camera than Samsung T259, because it has a way more MP back camera.

Samsung Star II has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung T259. Samsung Star II features better battery performance than Samsung T259, because it has a 25% greater battery size.

Even being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Star II is also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes it an easy decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.