Global Score | |
39 | 41.9 |
Basic Information | |
Samsung | Samsung |
2008-02-11 | 2012-11-29 |
3.85 x 2.16 x 0.45 inches | 4.10 x 2.10 x 0.80 inches |
3.54 ounces | 4.70 ounces |
$ 125.00 | $ 105.00 |
Display / Screen | |
2.8 inches | 2.4 inches |
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
TFT | -- |
143 pixels per inch | 167 pixels per inch |
Capacitive | No touch screen |
5.8 | 6.1 |
Performance | |
-- | STE PNX6809L chipset |
processor | Single-Core 468 MHz processor |
-- | 128 MB RAM |
GPU | GPU |
5.76 | 6.57 |
Storage | |
225,28 MB internal memory | 262,14 MB internal memory |
microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
0.8 | 2.12 |
Camera | |
5.00 MP | 3.00 MP |
5.5 | 5.06 |
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
SIM | SIM |
0.9 | 1 |
Battery Life | |
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1300mAh Li-Ion Battery |
Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
250 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 480 hours standby time 9 hours talk time |
2.56 | 3.04 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
-- | GPS |
The Samsung Rugby III is a little bit better than Samsung Tocco, with a 41.9 score against 39. The Samsung Rugby III body is incredibly newer, but much heavier and notably thicker than Samsung Tocco. Samsung Rugby III counts with a better performing CPU than Samsung Tocco, because it has more cores.
The Samsung Rugby III counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Tocco, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same 320 x 240px resolution, the Samsung Rugby III also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch. The Samsung Rugby III features a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Tocco, because it has 262,14 MB internal memory.
Samsung Tocco captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Rugby III, because it has a back facing camera with lot more MP. Samsung Rugby III has greater battery performance than Samsung Tocco, because it has 1300mAh of battery capacity instead of 1000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Samsung Rugby III is also by far the cheapest.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.