Search


Compare phones

Global Score
32.535.7
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
--2009-01-29
4.20 x 2.20 x 0.60 inches4.28 x 1.82 x 0.46 inches
4.00 ounces3.39 ounces
$ 250.00$ 175.00
Display / Screen
2.8 inches2.2 inches
--240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
--TFT
--182 pixels per inch
ResistiveNo touch screen
2.76.4
processor processor
--64 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--17,41 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD (up to 4 GB) external memory slot
1.320.86
Camera
1.30 MP3.20 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
4.515.61
CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.3
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery1050mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
5 hours talk time450 hours standby time
7.5 hours talk time
2.562.64
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 2.0, EDR

Comparison review

The Nokia 6303 classic has a global score of 35.7, which is a bit better than the Samsung Trender's 32.5 overall score. The Nokia 6303 classic construction is a lot thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Trender. Nokia 6303 classic's processing unit is very similar to the Samsung Trender one, both have 0 cores.

The Nokia 6303 classic counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Trender, although it has a lot smaller display. The Samsung Trender has a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Nokia 6303 classic, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 32 GB.

The Nokia 6303 classic has just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Trender, because it has a 1050mAh battery capacity. The Nokia 6303 classic shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Trender, because it has a way better 3.2 mega pixels resolution back camera.

Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Nokia 6303 classic is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.