Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| -- | 2017-11-03 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is much better than Samsung W2016's 72.2 general score. The iPhone X is a just a little lighter and thinner phone than the Samsung W2016. IPhone X counts with a quite superior performance than Samsung W2016, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone X also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone X counts with a much better screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a just a bit higher display density, a much larger display and a way better 1125 x 2436px resolution. The iPhone X counts with a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung W2016, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
IPhone X has a little bit better camera than Samsung W2016, because although it has a way lower resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low-light situations. Apple iPhone X features a much longer battery duration than Samsung W2016, because it has a 36% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.