Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-26 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 383 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR has a score of 82, which is much better than Samsung W2016's 72.2 general score. IPhone XR's body is noticeably thinner but just a bit heavier than Samsung W2016. The Apple iPhone XR features just a bit better looking display than Samsung W2016, because although it has a quite lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a really bigger display and a better 828 x 1792 pixels resolution.
The iPhone XR counts with a quite superior performance than Samsung W2016, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bit processor. Samsung W2016 and iPhone XR both count with incredibly similar memory to install applications and games, both of them have equal internal memory.
The iPhone XR counts with a really longer battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has 2942mAh of battery capacity. The iPhone XR has a little bit better camera than Samsung W2016, because although it has a much less MP resolution back-facing camera and a lower video definition, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.