Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| -- | 2016-10-20 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gray and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 5 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a score of 80.2, which is much better than the Samsung W2016's overall score of 72.2. Google Pixel is a notably lighter and incredibly thinner phone than Samsung W2016. The Samsung W2016 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more cores.
Google Pixel features a slightly better looking display than Samsung W2016, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, a larger display and a just a little better pixel count in each screen inch. The Google Pixel counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung W2016, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel features just a bit better camera than Samsung W2016, although it has a back facing camera with a much lower resolution, a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. Google Pixel features a really longer battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has a 2770mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.