| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 12 |
| -- | 2022-07-21 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| -- | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Google Pixel 6a has a global score of 76.4, which is a bit better than Samsung W2016's 72.2 score. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but Google Pixel 6a has older 12 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version. The Google Pixel 6a design is just a little lighter and incredibly thinner than Samsung W2016.
Samsung W2016 features a much more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has 3 GB less RAM, it also counts with 2 more CPU cores. The Samsung W2016 has just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 6a, although it has a little worse amount of pixels per inch in the display, a way smaller display and a way lower 768 x 1280 pixels resolution.
Google Pixel 6a has a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 6a has a little bit better camera than Samsung W2016, because although it has a way less megapixels back facing camera and a worse video resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations.
The Google Pixel 6a counts with a much better battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has a 4410mAh battery size instead of 2000mAh.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.