Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Metal | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 5 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 383 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is a little bit better than the Samsung W2016, with a 77.7 score against 72.2. The HTC One M9 design is incredibly thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung W2016. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop.
HTC One M9 counts with a more vivid display than Samsung W2016, because it has a bigger screen, a lot better resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a little bit higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen. HTC One M9 features a little better processing power than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also has a 64-bits CPU and an extra graphics co-processor.
The HTC One M9 counts with a slightly better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung W2016, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB. HTC One M9 has a slightly better camera than Samsung W2016, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the HTC One M9 also counts with a higher resolution back facing camera.
The HTC One M9 features a much better battery duration than Samsung W2016, because it has a 42% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.