Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-23 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue, Red and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 383 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K52 is just a bit better than the Samsung W2016, with a 76 score against 72.2. LG K52's body is notably thinner but a little bit heavier than Samsung W2016. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG K52 has older 10 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop.
The Samsung W2016 features a bit sharper display than LG K52, because although it has a really smaller screen and a quite lower 768 x 1280px resolution, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display. The LG K52 has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG K52 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG K52 counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung W2016, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG K52 also has more RAM. The LG K52 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the LG K52 also has a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations and a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera.
LG K52 has a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung W2016, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.