Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-06 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Titan gray |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 383 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is better than the Samsung W2016, getting an 85.4 score against 72.2. These phones have Android OS, but the LG K92 has 10 version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop. LG K92 is a extremely thinner but heavier cellphone than Samsung W2016. The LG K92 features a bit faster processor than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG K92 also has more RAM memory.
The LG K92 counts with a little bit better display than Samsung W2016, because it has a little bit higher amount of pixels in each inch of screen, a really larger display and a way higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The LG K92 captures much better photos and videos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG K92 also has a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
LG K92 features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung W2016, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. LG K92 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung W2016, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.