Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-03-09 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is much better than Samsung W2016's 72.2 score. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but the LG V30S ThinQ has 8.0 Oreo version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop, giving a couple additional features. The LG V30S ThinQ body is notably thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung W2016.
LG V30S ThinQ has a bit superior CPU than Samsung W2016, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a better looking display than Samsung W2016, because it has a higher pixel density, a lot larger display and a lot higher 1440 x 2880px resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ shoots slightly better videos and photos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have a 16 mega-pixels resolution back camera, the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung W2016, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much better battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.