Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is much better than Samsung W2016, having a score of 81.3 against 72.2. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is notably thinner and lighter than Samsung W2016. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung W2016, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a more vivid display than Samsung W2016, because it has a much bigger screen, a lot higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a greater pixels density. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same resolution back camera and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a bigger aperture for better low light images.
LG V35 ThinQ features a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung W2016, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much better battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.