Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than Samsung W2016's 72.2 score. The LG Velvet design weights the same than Samsung W2016, but it's noticeably thinner. LG Velvet counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung W2016, because it has a just a little better pixel number per inch of display, a lot larger display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels.
The LG Velvet counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung W2016, because it has more internal memory and an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet has just a little better performance than Samsung W2016, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG Velvet also has more RAM.
LG Velvet features a very superior battery duration than Samsung W2016, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 2000mAh. LG Velvet shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the LG Velvet also has a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.