Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-14 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is much better than Samsung W2016, getting an 89.6 score against 72.2. These phones come with Android OS, but Motorola edge has the older 10 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop. Motorola edge is a just a little bit heavier but noticeably thinner phone than the Samsung W2016.
The Motorola edge has a bit better performance than Samsung W2016, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola edge also has more RAM memory. The Motorola edge features a bit sharper display than Samsung W2016, because it has a just a bit better display pixel density, a lot bigger display and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Motorola edge has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung W2016, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola edge counts with a greater camera than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola edge also has a larger aperture and a lot more MP back-facing camera.
The Motorola edge features a much longer battery performance than Samsung W2016, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.