Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-08-19 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a global score of 87.1, which is a lot better than Samsung W2016's general score of 72.2. Motorola Edge 20 Lite's design is just a bit heavier but incredibly thinner than the Samsung W2016. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 20 Lite has older 11 version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a slightly better screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a really bigger display, a quite better count of pixels in each display inch and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung W2016, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung W2016, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite captures greater videos and photos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and faster 120 fps video frame rate.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a superior battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has a 150 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.