Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 12 |
| -- | 2022-09-08 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is a little bit better than Samsung W2016, having a global score of 78.5 against 72.2. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's body is just a bit lighter and noticeably thinner than Samsung W2016. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has the previous 12 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a much better screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a just a little better pixel amount per inch in the display, a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a lot bigger display. The Samsung W2016 features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung W2016, because it has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels, a way higher video resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a very superior battery performance than Samsung W2016, because it has a 120 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.