Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 12 |
| -- | 2022-09-08 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has an overall score of 80.9, which is much better than Samsung W2016's 72.2 overall score. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's design is incredibly thinner but just a little heavier than Samsung W2016. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has 12 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a more vivid display than Samsung W2016, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch of screen, a really bigger display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Samsung W2016 has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 5 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more CPU cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a way better battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has a 150 percent more battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a much better video resolution and a way more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.