Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 13 |
| -- | 2023-05-04 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 is just a bit better than Samsung W2016, with a score of 77.2 against 72.2. Both phones we compare here use Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 40 has older 13 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version. The Motorola Edge 40 is a a lot thinner and just a bit lighter cellphone than the Samsung W2016.
The Motorola Edge 40 has a much better looking display than Samsung W2016, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a much bigger screen and a bit higher display density. Motorola Edge 40 counts with a superior storage for applications and games than Samsung W2016, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung W2016 has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 40 features a way better battery duration than Samsung W2016, because it has a 120% bigger battery size. The Motorola Edge 40 has a much better camera than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 40 also has a way bigger diafragm aperture and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.