Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 14 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | -- |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | Interstellar Black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has an overall score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than Samsung W2016's 72.2 global score. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024)'s construction is incredibly lighter and thinner than the Samsung W2016. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has the older 14 version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop.
Samsung W2016 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a way smaller screen, a little inferior amount of pixels per inch in the display and a way lower resolution of 768 x 1280. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung W2016 counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) counts with a superior battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has a 130% greater battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung W2016, because it has a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a much better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.