Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-16 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a lot better than the Samsung W2016, having a general score of 87.1 against 72.2. These phones come with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has older 14 version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body is way thinner but a bit heavier than Samsung W2016.
The Samsung W2016 has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 9 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much more vibrant display than Samsung W2016, because it has a just a little better pixels density, a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a much larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with much more memory for applications and games than Samsung W2016, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung W2016, because it has a 125% greater battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a way higher resolution camera in the back and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.