Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-12-07 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 383 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G is better than Samsung W2016, having an 81.5 score against 72.2. Moto G 5G's design is a lot thinner but somewhat heavier than the Samsung W2016. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Moto G 5G has the previous 10 version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop.
The Moto G 5G features just a bit better screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a just a bit more pixels per display inch, a lot higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a really larger screen. Motorola Moto G 5G has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB.
Moto G 5G counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung W2016, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Moto G 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G 5G has a better camera than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a bigger aperture and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Motorola Moto G 5G has a superior battery performance than Samsung W2016, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.