Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-04-15 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Iridescent Ocean, Iridescent Sky and Slate Grey |
| Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 383 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G SM8250-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 5760 x 3240 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G100 is much better than the Samsung W2016, having an 88.9 score against 72.2. Moto G100's design is somewhat heavier but thinner than Samsung W2016. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Moto G100 has an older 11 version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop. The Moto G100 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung W2016, because it has a bit more pixels per inch in the display, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a really bigger screen.
The Motorola Moto G100 counts with a bit better processor than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G100 also has more RAM memory. The Moto G100 features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Moto G100 features a superior battery lifetime than Samsung W2016, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Moto G100 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung W2016, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low light environments, a lot higher video quality and a way more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.