Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-11-18 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Metal | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 383 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a global score of 86.2, which is better than the Samsung W2016's overall score of 72.2. The Motorola Moto G200 5G design is heavier but way thinner than the Samsung W2016. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Motorola Moto G200 5G has the previous 11 version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop.
Moto G200 5G has just a bit better processing power than Samsung W2016, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a much bigger display, a just a bit more pixels per inch of display and a lot better 1080 x 2460 resolution.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G features much more memory for applications and games than Samsung W2016, because it has 128 GB internal memory. Motorola Moto G200 5G features a much longer battery duration than Samsung W2016, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Moto G200 5G takes a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G200 5G also has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.