Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-09-01 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force has a global score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than Samsung W2016's 72.2 overall score. The Moto Z Force body is just a little bit lighter and thinner than Samsung W2016. Both devices we are comparing here use Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto Z Force has a more recent 7.0 Nougat version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop, so it provides some additional features and performance optimizations.
Samsung W2016 has a little bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with 4 more CPU cores. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a little more vivid screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a lot better 1440 x 2560 resolution, a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a way larger display.
Moto Z Force captures a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Moto Z Force also has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images.
Moto Z Force has a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z Force also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Force features a superior battery duration than Samsung W2016, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.