Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| -- | 2017-06-29 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Metal | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play is slightly better than Samsung W2016, getting a global score of 77.4 against 72.2. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play is a lighter and way thinner cellphone than Samsung W2016. The Moto Z2 Play counts with a little sharper display than Samsung W2016, because it has a really bigger screen, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a bit higher pixels density.
The Moto Z2 Play features a much greater storage for apps and games than Samsung W2016, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Play also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a bit better CPU than Samsung W2016, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has more RAM.
Moto Z2 Play counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung W2016, because it has a 3000mAh battery size instead of 2000mAh. Samsung W2016 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung W2016 also counts with a much higher 16 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.