Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-08-16 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 is a little bit better than Samsung W2016, with a global score of 77.6 against 72.2. These phones include Android OS, but Moto Z3 has 9.0 Pie version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version. The Moto Z3 is a thinner and lighter device than Samsung W2016. Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung W2016, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has 1 GB more RAM.
Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution, a lot bigger display and a little bit greater pixel density. The Moto Z3 features a superior storage for apps and games than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z3 also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto Z3 has a really longer battery duration than Samsung W2016, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity. The Moto Z3 and Samsung W2016 have extremely similar cameras, although the Moto Z3 has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photography, a lot less MP back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.