Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-04 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 383 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is much better than Samsung W2016, getting a overall score of 79.8 against 72.2. Motorola One Hyper's design is way thinner but just a little bit heavier than the Samsung W2016. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola One Hyper has 11 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop.
The Motorola One Hyper and Samsung W2016 both feature quite similar processors, and although the Motorola One Hyper has 1 GB more RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola One Hyper has a bit more vivid display than Samsung W2016, because it has a just a bit better amount of pixels in each inch of display, a way bigger display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Motorola One Hyper features a much greater memory for games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same camera aperture, the Motorola One Hyper also has a way higher resolution camera in the back.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung W2016, because it has a 100% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.