Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| -- | 2019-05-15 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and Brown |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 383 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has a global score of 80.7, which is much better than the Samsung W2016's 72.2 general score. Motorola One Vision's construction weights the same than the Samsung W2016, but it's extremely thinner. The Motorola One Vision counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung W2016, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola One Vision also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Motorola One Vision has just a bit better looking display than Samsung W2016, because it has a much better 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution, a lot bigger screen and a quite greater pixels density. Motorola One Vision has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory.
Motorola One Vision captures way better pictures and videos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and video and a camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Motorola One Vision features a very superior battery performance than Samsung W2016, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.