Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is a lot better than Samsung W2016's score of 72.2. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola razr (2020) has older 11 version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version. The Motorola razr (2020) design is noticeably thinner but a little heavier than Samsung W2016.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a bit faster CPU than Samsung W2016, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 5 GB more RAM. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a screen that is just as good as the Samsung W2016 one, because although the Motorola razr (2020) has a quite inferior pixels quantity in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 876 x 2142 pixels and a really bigger display.
Motorola razr (2020) shoots greater photographs and videos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a bigger camera aperture and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels. The Motorola razr (2020) has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung W2016, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung W2016, because it has a 40% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.