Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 12 |
| -- | 2022-08-18 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2022) is much better than Samsung W2016, having a overall score of 81.1 against 72.2. Motorola razr (2022) is a just a bit heavier but notably thinner cellphone than the Samsung W2016. These phones have Android operating system, but Motorola razr (2022) has the previous 12 version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop.
Motorola razr (2022) has a bit better screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a much larger screen, a bit higher screen density and a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Motorola razr (2022) counts with a much better storage to install games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola razr (2022) features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola razr (2022) features a much better camera than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a way better battery duration than Samsung W2016, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.