Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 15 |
| -- | 2025-04-24 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | -- |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 7 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 383 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a general score of 79.2, which is slightly better than the Samsung W2016's 72.2 score. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a a little bit heavier but way thinner phone than the Samsung W2016. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has the previous 15 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop.
The Samsung W2016 has a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung W2016 features a way better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lot smaller screen.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung W2016, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung W2016, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung W2016, because it has a bigger aperture, a camera with a much higher resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.