Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-05-01 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.65 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight Sun and Nordic Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 1080 x 2400 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 383 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.57 | 8.8 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4470mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia X20 has a score of 77.2, which is a bit better than Samsung W2016's 72.2 score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia X20 has an older 11 version while Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version. The Nokia X20 is a heavier but extremely thinner device than the Samsung W2016.
Nokia X20 features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia X20 also has more RAM. The Nokia X20 features a little more vivid display than Samsung W2016, because it has a really larger display, a little higher display pixels density and a way higher resolution of 2400 x 1080px.
Nokia X20 has a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung W2016, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung W2016 has a slightly better camera than Nokia X20, although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution.
Nokia X20 has a superior battery duration than Samsung W2016, because it has a 4470mAh battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.