Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-07-02 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 has an overall score of 76.1, which is a bit better than the Samsung W2016's 72.2 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A22 construction is notably thinner but a bit heavier than the Samsung W2016. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A22 has 12 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version.
The Galaxy A22's processor is just as good as the CPU in Samsung W2016, and although the Galaxy A22 has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Samsung W2016 has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A22, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 768 x 1280 pixels and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels number in each screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung W2016 has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A22.
The Samsung W2016 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot worse resolution camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.