Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-03-11 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is much better than Samsung W2016, having a score of 79.4 against 72.2. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but Galaxy A35 5G has 14 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version. The Galaxy A35 5G construction is noticeably thinner but somewhat heavier than the Samsung W2016.
Samsung W2016 counts with an extremely better processor than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a little bit higher pixel density and a lot larger display.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy A35 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a much more MP back facing camera and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a way better battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.