Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | -- |
| -- | 2021-03-17 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is way better than Samsung W2016, getting a overall score of 90.7 against 72.2. The Samsung Galaxy A52 construction is just a little heavier but extremely thinner than Samsung W2016. Galaxy A52 counts with a little bit better display than Samsung W2016, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a really bigger screen and a little greater pixels density.
Galaxy A52 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung W2016, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A52 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy A52 has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung W2016, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also has a larger diafragm aperture for better photos in low light situations and a lot more mega pixels camera. Galaxy A52 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung W2016, because it has a 125 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.