Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-19 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is way better than the Samsung W2016, getting a score of 91.3 against 72.2. The Galaxy A52 5G body is just a bit heavier but thinner than the Samsung W2016. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS, but Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has just a little better performance than Samsung W2016, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better looking display than Samsung W2016, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little better pixel density and a really larger screen.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung W2016, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a bigger camera aperture and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior battery duration than Samsung W2016, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.