Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-09-01 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has a score of 91.1, which is way better than the Samsung W2016's 72.2 score. Galaxy A52s's body is way thinner but just a bit heavier than the Samsung W2016. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52s has an older 11 version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop.
The Galaxy A52s counts with a little faster processor than Samsung W2016, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A52s also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a little sharper screen than Samsung W2016, because it has a just a little better pixels density, a lot bigger screen and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Galaxy A52s takes way better pictures and videos than Samsung W2016, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also has a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography in low-light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than Samsung W2016, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1 TB and more internal storage. Galaxy A52s features a very superior battery life than Samsung W2016, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.