Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-09-27 |
| 4.74 x 2.40 x 0.59 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.9 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1280 x 768 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 383 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is much better than the Samsung W2016, having a score of 97.6 against 72.2. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Samsung W2016 has Android 5.1 Lollipop version. The Galaxy Fold construction is incredibly thinner but much heavier than Samsung W2016.
The Galaxy Fold features a bit better looking screen than Samsung W2016, because although it has a little inferior pixels quantity in each screen inch, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1536 x 2152px and a much bigger display. The Galaxy Fold has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung W2016, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Fold features a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung W2016, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Fold counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung W2016, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with a way worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a way larger camera aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy Fold features a superior battery performance than Samsung W2016, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity against 2000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.